Jacob Mountgarrett’s buttons – a dubious character

No. 20

Zoom In
Zoom Out
Pan Left
Pan Up
Pan Down
Pan Right
Show Full Image
 

These two little buttons look innocent enough however their likely owner was anything but… Jacob Mountgarrett (c. 1773–1828), arrived in Sydney in March 1803 and shortly after was appointed as the surgeon for the new settlement at Risdon Cove. Mountgarrett’s hut was the first substantial building to be constructed at the settlement, and these buttons – from a naval surgeon’s uniform – were discovered in 1980 by archaeologists excavating his hut site, the oldest surviving structure at Risdon.

Despite his title and social standing, Mountgarrett quickly carved out a position of infamy, being implicated in the killing of Mumirimina Aboriginal people at Risdon on 3 May, 1804. This dark episode in the new colony’s history is a foundation story for the European invasion of Tasmania, and for the colonists’ relations with Tasmanian Aboriginal people. Following the killings, Mountgarrett was responsible for sending at least one body to Sydney in a barrel as a ‘specimen’. He also adopted a young boy who was orphaned in the incident, christening him Robert Hobart May, and went on to adopt other Aboriginal children in northern Tasmania, including Dolly Dalrymple.

As the years passed, Mountgarrett went on to be connected to a variety of dubious activities. After being accused of assisting harbour master Peter Mills in his bushranging activities, Mountgarrett was put on trial in Sydney in 1815. Although acquitted, Mountgarrett’s luck didn’t last, with one of his arms needing to be amputated. Following this, he sought permission to retire but his pension was refused and he returned to duty in December 1817. In September 1818, Governor Macquarie recommended that Mountgarrett be dismissed for a range of misdemeanours, including stealing, and he was eventually replaced as surgeon, in 1821. Mountgarrett died insolvent on 27 January 1828, and was buried in the old Church of England burial ground in Launceston.

Comments on this object

  • Quote - "These two little buttons look innocent enough however their likely owner was anything but..." Can we be sure Mountgarrett was really this bad, after all, he took the 2-3 year old boy into his care when nobody else it seems was willing..!! Quote - "Despite his title and social standing, Mountgarrett quickly carved out a position of infamy, being implicated in the killing of Mumirimina Aboriginal people at Risdon on 3 May, 1804". Mountagarrett was certainly there, but no evidence, written or otherwise, to say he personally killed anyone. Quote - "Following the killings, Mountgarrett was responsible for sending at least one body to Sydney in a barrel as a 'specimen'. We don't know for sure that a body was dissected and/or sent in a barrel as a 'specimen' Certainly he made the suggestion, in a note to Knopwood, that "if Mr. Bowden wishes to see him dissected I will be happy to see him with you tomorrow", but as Knopwood stated in his diary the next day, "Mr.Bowden and myself were unable to secure a boat for Risdon"...........and nothing mentioned about the matter at all after that. Whether Mountgarrett went ahead with a dissection is not known, but there are certainly no records to say he did or didn't and no records of a 'specimen' in a barrel being sent to NSW. It's Edward White's statement in 1830 that is the only reference to this, and we can never be sure just how accurate his statement was. Scott Seymour
  • We must dig deeper than these token objects or second-hand published histories to find the real Mountgarrett by witness accounts and local histories. eg: Extract below from original witness transcripts to Police Magistrates in Launceston from witnesses to the shooting event of Dalrymple Briggs by Jacob Mountgarrett, whom he calls his the 'black servant' (not adopted child) in 1825, Lake River, Norfolk Plains: To Wit, The information of Mr William Brumby who being sworn saith, I am a settler and reside on the Lake River, at the back of Norfolk Plains, Doctor Jacob Mountgarrett also resides at a farm on the Lake River; on Saturday afternoon the fifteenth or sixteenth day of last July between five and six o’clock, I was riding along the Road near Dr Mountgarrett’s house I heard the cry of murder, soon afterwards I saw a half caste native girl called Dalrymple, who has lived with Doctor Mountgarrett some years, running from his House towards the Road, I heard the report of a fowling Piece, Musket or Pistol and saw a Man standing at the corner of Doctor Mountgarrett’s House from whence the shot came, he had a blue coat on and a white night cap; I rode up to the Girl, she was crying, I observed one of her legs was bloody, she said I will go to Mr Archer my Master has shot me.".... WM Brumby Sworn before me at Launceston this fifth day of August 1825 PM Hargrave JP Original records as: Manuscript 3251 at the National Library of Australia Transcript on: http://manuscript3251.wordpress.com/2009/10/24/ms-3251-1825-31-black-natives-also-paton-vs-gregson/ Julie Gough
  • You've left out the rest of the story? The Dr. who examined Dolly found no evidence of a gun shot wound, Mountgarrett was cleared of the charges, and Dolly testified that it was her that had alerted Mountgarrett to an opossum in a tree that night, and that when Mountgarrett took a shot or two at it, she was hit in the foot by a very small piece of lead shot,which no doubt did scare her, and would have hurt a bit, that was removed by Mountgarretts wife at the house. Dolly continued to live with the Mountgarrett's after the incident. It's good to tell the whole story, not just the part that appears to make someone guilty. Scott Seymour